Guy de Maupassant (1850–1893)
Life
Maupassant was born in Normandy to minor aristocrats in a marriage that was coming apart. His mother Laure — sharp, literary, Flaubert’s childhood friend — separated from his father when Guy was eleven, which was nearly unheard of in 1860s France. That mother is the reason he became a writer. She hand-delivered him to Flaubert in Paris and told the master to take over his training. Flaubert did, with a discipline that bordered on cruel: years of writing exercises, unreadable apprentice pieces, sentences ripped apart and rebuilt, no publication allowed. Meanwhile Maupassant had signed up for the Franco-Prussian War, seen the French army collapse, watched the Paris Commune burn, and come out of it all with a permanent distrust of official heroism.
He spent the 1870s as a minor clerk in the Naval Ministry and then the Ministry of Education, hating the desk, rowing obsessively on the Seine on weekends, sleeping with anyone who would, and writing after hours. In 1880 he contributed a story called “Boule de Suif” to an anthology organized around Zola. Flaubert read it and told him he had arrived. Flaubert died two months later.
The decade that followed is one of the fastest, most intense careers in 19th-century literature. Between 1880 and 1891 he published six novels, three travel books, and around 300 short stories. He made more money than almost any French writer of his time, bought a yacht called Bel-Ami, and kept up an exhausting social life in Paris. He had also contracted syphilis in his early twenties, and by the late 1880s it was eating his nervous system. He started hallucinating. In January 1892 he tried to cut his own throat. He died eighteen months later in a private asylum in Paris, age 42.
What They Were Doing
Maupassant is the guy you read when you want fiction that doesn’t flinch. Flaubert trained him to sit in front of a thing — a woman, a coach, a field in Normandy at dusk — until he could find the one exact sentence that would make it appear on the page, and then to stop. You can feel that training everywhere. The prose is clean, cold, and a little mean. He does not reassure you.
His real subject is what people do when they think no one important is watching. “Boule de Suif” is a whole social order in miniature: respectable passengers in a coach pressure a prostitute to sleep with a Prussian officer so they can all keep moving, and then despise her for it once she has. Bel-Ami is the same mechanism scaled up to Paris — a handsome, empty journalist sleeps his way up through the political class, and the book is less outraged than coldly impressed. No moralizing, no authorial hand-holding. He just shows you what people do when nobody’s stopping them, and lets you draw the conclusions.
The other strain in his work is the supernatural one. “The Horla” is a man watching his own mind collapse, and it was partly diagnosis — he was losing his. Those horror stories aren’t a detour from his realism. They come from the same eye. The realist stares at the respectable dinner table until he can see the greed underneath. The horror writer stares at his own reflection until he can see something else looking back.
Influence
Maupassant and Chekhov together invented the modern short story. Nobody writing in the form gets past them. Tolstoy quoted him, O. Henry and Somerset Maugham modeled on him, and Isaac Babel called him one of his masters. His influence on American writers is enormous and a little underrated — Ambrose Bierce, Kate Chopin, and later Raymond Carver all owe him things. “The Horla” fed straight into Lovecraft and the whole 20th-century horror tradition of the narrator who cannot trust his own senses. Even the famous twist ending of “The Necklace” has been imitated so many times it now reads as a cliché — which is the fate of any device that works too well.
Connections
-
Honoré de Balzac — the great French predecessor who mapped society as a whole system; Maupassant narrows the lens to a single scene and finds the same rot. [[bel-ami|Bel-Ami]] is basically a Balzac arc compressed into a meaner, faster book.
-
Leo Tolstoy — admired Maupassant’s stories and wrote an entire essay about him. The Russian wanted moral weight, the Frenchman refused to provide it, and they’re both better for the argument.
-
Ernest Hemingway — the clean, cold, unsentimental sentence Hemingway is famous for goes straight back to Maupassant through Flaubert. Strip away the adjectives, don’t tell the reader what to feel.
-
Bel-Ami — his portrait of a beautiful, empty careerist climbing Paris on other people’s beds. One of the coldest novels of the 19th century and somehow also one of the funniest.
-
Fyodor Dostoevsky — the inverse temperament. Dostoevsky shouts about the soul; Maupassant stares at a dinner table until the soul gives itself away. Both were writing the same century’s anxieties in totally different keys.
-
Bel-Ami (1885) — novel
-
A Life (Une Vie, 1883) — novel
-
The Horla (1887) — novella, proto-horror
-
Boule de Suif (1880) — the short story that made his name
-
The Necklace (La Parure, 1884)
-
Pierre and Jean (1888) — novel, with his famous preface on realist technique